Search this site

 

Sunday, June 14, 2009

RBI Circular on Buyback / Prepayment of Foreign Currency Convertible Bonds (FCCBs)

RBI/2008-09/461,   (A. P. (DIR Series) Circular No 65, Dated :April 28,  2009) 

Attention of Authorised Dealer Category - I (AD Category - I) banks is invited to A.P.(DIR Series) Circular No. 39 dated December 8, 2008 and A.P. (DIR Series) Circular No. 58 dated March 13, 2009 on the captioned subject. In terms of Para 4 B of A.P (DIR Series) Circular No. 39 dated December 8, 2008, Reserve Bank has been considering proposals from Indian companies for buyback of FCCBs out of their internal accruals, under the approval route up to a total amount of USD 50 million of the redemption value per company, subject to a minimum discount of 25 per cent on the book value.

2. As announced in Para 110 of the Annual Policy Statement 2009-10 and keeping in view the benefits accruing to the Indian companies, the current policy has been reviewed and it has been decided to increase the total amount of permissible buyback of FCCBs, out of internal accruals, from USD 50 million of the redemption value per company to USD 100 million, under the approval route by linking the higher amount of buyback to larger discounts. Accordingly, Indian companies may henceforth be permitted to buyback FCCBs up to USD 100 million of the redemption value per company, out of internal accruals, with the prior approval of the Reserve Bank, subject to a:

i) minimum discount of 25 per cent of book value for redemption value up to USD 50 million; ii) minimum discount of 35 per cent of book value for the redemption value over USD 50 million and up to USD 75 million; and iii) minimum discount of 50 per cent of book value for the redemption value of USD 75 million and up to USD 100 million. 

3. All other terms and conditions stipulated in A.P. (DIR Series) Circular No. 39 dated December 8, 2008 will continue to be applicable.  This facility shall come into force with immediate effect and the entire procedure of buyback should be completed by December 31, 2009 as specified in A.P. (DIR Series) Circular No. 58 dated March 13, 2009. 4. AD Category - I banks may bring the contents of this circular to the notice of their constituents and customers concerned. 5. The directions contained in this circular have been issued under sections 10(4) and 11 (1) of the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 (42 of 1999) and is without prejudice to permissions / approvals, if any, required under any other law. 

Yours faithfully

(Salim Gangadharan)

Chief General Manager –in - Charge

 

Foreign Exchange Management (Deposit) Regulations, 2000-Loans to Non Residents / third party against security of Non Resident (External) Rupee Accounts [NR (E) RA / Foreign Currency Non Resident (Bank) Accounts [FCNR(B)] -Deposits

RBI/2008-09/462 ( A. P. (DIR Series) Circular No.66 Dated: April 28, 2009)

Attention of Authorised Dealer Category - I banks and Authorised banks (the banks) is invited to Para 6 (a), (b), (c) and (d) of Schedule 1 and Para 9 of Schedule 2 to Foreign Exchange Management (Deposit) Regulations, 2000 notified vide Notification No. FEMA 5 / 2000-RB dated May 3, 2000, as amended from time to time regarding loans against security of funds held in deposit accounts. Further, attention of the banks is also invited to A. P. (DIR Series) Circular No.29 dated January 31, 2007 prohibiting banks from granting fresh loans or renewing existing loans in excess of Rs.20 lakh against NR(E)RA and FCNR(B) deposits either to the depositors or third parties. The banks were also advised not to undertake artificial slicing of the loan amount to circumvent the ceiling.

2. As announced in  Para 111 of the Annual Policy Statement 2009-10, it has been decided to enhance the existing cap of Rs.20 lakh to Rs.100 lakh on loans against security of funds held in  NR(E)RA and FCNR(B) deposits either to the depositors or third parties.

3.Accordingly, the banks may now grant loans against NR(E)RA and FCNR(B) deposits either to the depositors or third parties up to a maximum limit of Rs.100 lakh. The banks are also advised not to undertake artificial slicing of the loan amount to circumvent the aforesaid ceiling.

4.The above instructions shall come into force with immediate effect.

5.The banks may bring the contents of this circular to the notice of their constituents and customers concerned.  

6. The directions contained in this circular have been issued under sections 10(4) and 11 (1) of the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 (42 of 1999) and is without prejudice to permissions/approvals, if any, required under any other law.

Yours faithfully,

(Salim Gangadharan) Chief General Manager-in-Charge

 

RBI Circular on External Commercial Borrowings (ECB) Policy - Liberalisation

RBI/2008-09/460 A.P. (DIR Series) Circular No. 64 Dated : April 28, 2009

 Attention of Authorised Dealer Category - I (AD Category - I) banks is invited to the A.P. (DIR Series) Circular No. 46 dated January 2, 2009 relating to External Commercial Borrowings (ECB) and in terms of Para 2 of the circular, it was decided to dispense with the requirement of all-in-cost ceilings on ECB, under the approval route, until June 30, 2009. Accordingly, eligible borrowers, proposing to avail of ECB beyond the prescribed all-in-cost ceilings could approach the Reserve Bank, under the approval route.

2. As announced in Para 107 of the Annual Policy Statement 2009-10 and considering the continuing pressure on credit spreads in the international markets, it has been decided to extend the relaxation in all–in-cost  ceilings, under the approval route,  until December 31, 2009. This relaxation will be reviewed in December 2009.

3. The modifications to the ECB guidelines shall come into force with immediate effect. All other aspects of ECB policy, such as USD 500 million limit per company per financial year under the Automatic Route, eligible borrower, recognised lender, end-use, average maturity period, prepayment, refinancing of existing ECB and reporting arrangements remain unchanged.

4. Necessary amendments to the Foreign Exchange Management (Borrowing or Lending in Foreign Exchange) Regulations, 2000 dated May 3, 2000 are being issued separately.

5. AD Category - I banks may bring the contents of this circular to the notice of their constituents and customers concerned.

6.The directions contained in this circular have been issued under sections 10(4) and 11 (1) of the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 (42 of 1999) and is without prejudice to permissions/approvals, if any, required under any other law.

Yours faithfully 

(Salim Gangadharan)

Chief General Manager –in -Charge

 

Announcement regarding the transfer of articles

To All the Members,

This has reference to the announcement regarding the transfer of articles dated 27th March, 2009.In view of the transitional difficulties experienced by members and students in the matter of transfer of articles, effected on or prior to 27th March, 2009, Institute with a view to mitigate the difficulties so experienced, has decided, that Form 109 [i.e. relating to transfer / termination of articles] complete in all respect received in the Institute upto 30th April, 2009 be processed as per the norms in place prior to the publication of the Announcement dated 27th March, 2009 containing the decision(s) of the Council.

In other words, any Form 109 received on or after May 1, 2009 shall not be taken on record, irrespective of the reason(s) for delay in submission.

CA. Uttam Prakash Agarwal

President,ICAI

 

Govt not fully geared up for change in TDS Rules relating to payment of TDS

A new form introduced by the Central Board for Direct Taxes (CBDT) to improve tax deductions at source (TDS) has allegedly made the process more cumbersome, and may even prompt the government to put the transition to the new regime in abeyance. The new form for tax deductors — those responsible for deducting tax while making a payment — came into force from April 1, 2009.

According to the new rules, deductors have to deposit the tax amount through online payment. The form prescribes tracking of every TDS transaction through a unique transaction number (UTN) that is to be provided at the time of e-payment of such tax. However, the government, a large deductor of tax itself, is not geared up for this change required by the tax body and cannot switch to e-payment mode completely, according to an official who didn't want to be named.

To switch to a complete e-payment mode, rules of central as well as state governments with regard to payments will have to be changed. At present, central and state government departments have a cheque or cash system of payment and changing these rules will be an uphill task for them. The tax department's own software may find it difficult to support the UTN, said the official.

The issue of notification of the new forms and problems related to its implementation had figured at a recent meeting of the CBDT.

"While April 1 is a logical start date for any such change, considering that the notification was issued only in the last week of March, I doubt whether non-corporate assesses would have enough time to gear up to these new and enhanced requirements. The generation of UTN is a new and untested aspect and should have ideally been tried on the existing set of e-paying assesses before expanding the scope of e-payment," said Amitabh Singh, partner, Ernst & Young.

All tax deductors have to also validate PAN of deductees from the tax authorities at the time of e-payment of tax instead of the present system of validation at the time of filing of quarterly returns.

This means that when a company deducts tax from the salary payment to its employee every month and deposits its with the tax authorities, it will have to get employees' respective PANs validated from the income tax department.

This would cause hardships to companies as they have to file quarterly returns with regard to TDS on salaries. At present there is no requirement PAN of validation at the time of payments. In fact, tax department's own system may find it difficult to handle the pressure placed by new requirements of the form.

 

Tax gains, easy compliance in comparison to companies set to make LLP popular

The ministry of corporate affairs has said that out of the eight lakh companies in India, a large chunk of them would be interested in getting converted into limited liability partnership (LLP) once a suitable tax structure for LLP is brought in.

"We are getting enquiries from thousands of companies every week who are interested in LLP and are waiting for its tax-structure. The tax-structure would be provided in the next Finance Bill by the ministry of finance and once this is through, then large numbers of companies are going to convert into LLP," a MCA official told FE.

According to the ministry, one of the main reason for a rise in demand for LLP is that its tax liability and compliance cost will be less in comparison to companies.The tax slab for LLP will be lower than the present corporate tax slab and the government will consider exempting profit up to a particular level from the tax liability.

Anurag Goel, secretary, MCA said, "In a couple of years, I see lakhs of LLPs coming in." Apart from the flexibility between the partners, there is also a provision of a foreign national as a partner, which is not possible at present.

To make the working of LLP easy, the government has introduced an e-governance mode, which will enable the LLPs to make use of its services anytime and anywhere. Apart from this, there has been a new portal of LLP launched by Corporate Professionals, a leading corporate legal and financial advisory firm, which will act as a facilitator for LLP.

LLP has an advantage of giving the ownership of assets to the partners where a partner can use his asset anytime and exit from the LLP. At the time of the exit, he will be in a position to easily take out his money without the LLP being dissolved.

There can be diverse activities under the LLP umbrella. Even chartered accountants, cost accountants, company secretaries, lawyers, and others can all come together as partners and form an LLP which is otherwise not possible.

The LLP will involve signing of an agreement with the assigning of the responsibilities to the partners where every partner is aware about his or her share of responsibilities.

In case of LLP, there is also no hard and fast rule of preparing a balance sheet as maintaining a simple statement of account is also enough.

 

I-T Dept makes online info submission mandatory for remittance of money to non-residents

In a move to plug loopholes that led to the alleged tax evasion by telecom giant Vodafone, the Income-Tax Department will make it mandatory for firms to submit information to it online before remitting payments to foreign companies, from July this year.

"The information ... shall be furnished electronically to the website designated by the Income Tax Department, and thereafter a signed printout of the said form shall be submitted prior to remitting the payment," according to a new rule of the I-T Department.

This rule, also applicable to people remitting money to non-residents, will be applicable from July one, as the software in this regard is being prepared, official sources said.

"This will help us monitor such transactions on a real time basis, and catch the evader, if there is a tax liability," a source said.

Currently, such information is filed by the company concerned to the RBI manually and it takes time for the I-T Department to receive a copy of that.

Anyone making payment to a non-resident will have to file information online in the new form 15CA.

For this, a sub-section (6) has been inserted under Section 195 of the Income-Tax Act. It is under this Section along with others that the Income-Tax Department had asked Vodafone to pay capital gains tax of 1.7 billion dollars for the 11 billion dollar overseas acquisition of Hutchison Essar (now Vodafone Essar).

Section 195 says, "Any person responsible for paying to a non-resident, not being a company, or to a foreign company, any interest or any sum chargeable under this act (other than interest on securities and salary) shall deduct income tax thereon at the rates in force."

Vodafone had contested the move on the grounds that as it had acquired the entire share capital of non-resident company CGP (Holdings) from Hutchison Telecommunication International Ltd (HTIL), a Cayman Islands company, the share capital purchase was paid outside India without deducting tax at source.

The matter then went for litigation with the Bombay High Court upholding the Income-Tax Department's position and ruling that the company was liable to pay capital gains tax on the purchase of shares in Cayman Islands.

Vodfone then filed a petition before the Supreme Court. The apex court dismissed the petition and ordered the Revenue Department to first dispose of Vodafone's objections regarding the absence of jurisdiction, and if the company did not agree with the decision, it could go directly to the Bombay High Court.

 

RBI, finance ministry divided on FDI relaxation given by of Press Notes

It's the central bank & finance ministry versus commerce over 'unintended liberalisation' permitted in February guidelines.

Differences have developed between both the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) and the finance ministry and within the government on the impact of Press Notes 2, 3 and 4 issued in February 2009 that significantly relax the guidelines on foreign direct investment (FDI).

The alignments appear to be RBI and the Department of Economic Affairs (DEA), which comes under the finance ministry, against the Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion (DIPP) under the commerce ministry, the nodal agency for FDI-related matters, to clarify several issues.

On March 20, RBI had asked the DEA to review the new guidelines on FDI issued under press notes 2, 3 and 4 in February 2009, saying they would lead de facto to full capital account convertibility.

The new norms need to be notified under the Foreign Exchange Management Act (Fema) by RBI to give it legal sanctity.

Significantly, the DEA also raised objections to the new FDI norms after receiving RBI's letter and has asked the DIPP to clarify several issues. (DEA was, however, involved in the process of formulating the new press notes.)

According to government officials close to the developments, DIPP feels a comprehensive review of the new norms is not possible. The department, however, is open to releasing clarifications, which could take the form of "minor tweaking and not complete reversal of the new norms".

Capital account convertibility means that an investor is allowed to move freely from the local currency to a foreign currency. India has limited capital account convertibility to prevent shocks to the capital account and maintain a stable exchange rate, by stipulating sectoral norms that ensure a lock-in period for investments.

The press notes simplify the method for calculating FDI and broadly state that as long as Indian promoters hold a majority stake (more than 51 per cent) in any operating-cum-investing company, it can bring investment up to 49.9 per cent through FDI. This company would be treated as an Indian company and it can invest through a joint venture in any other company that may be engaged in industries in which FDI has a sectoral limit. Several companies like retailer Pantaloon and media house UTV have restructured their organisations to raise FDI in their businesses through step-down joint ventures — FDI is prohibited in multi-brand retail and is restricted to 26 per cent for media

Questioning the proposed definition of Indian ownership and control, given in Press Note 2, RBI stated that ownership and control by a company may not be related to formal equity holding and the right to appoint a majority of directors on the board of the company in which the investments are being made.

"Control may be maintained through other forms such as funding through preference shares or loans, vesting of executive authority or super minority provisions (like right of first refusal or veto power) in minority shareholders through shareholder agreements," argued the central bank in its letter. "Therefore, there is a need to fine-tune the definition of control rather than relying on the power to appoint majority directors," the letter added.

Echoing RBI's views, the DEA has also stated that an investing company with 49 per cent FDI can go ahead and invest in any FDI-prohibited sectors or exceed the sectoral limits in those industries that have them, sources said.

"In one sweep, therefore, any sectoral cap of 49 per cent and below has become meaningless in so far as downstream investment by a company with foreign investment below 50 per cent and qualifying as an Indian owned and controlled company," the DEA argued in a letter, sources said.

"Such a company can apply for cable TV operations (49 per cent cap), FM broadcasting license (20 per cent cap), licensed defence items manufacture (26 per cent cap), printing news papers (26 per cent cap) up linking TV news channels (26 per cent cap) etc. Whether this stance has been approved as such or is an unintended liberalisation is not clear," the DEA letter said..

The central bank expressed a similar view. "Not only will this lead to the formation of Indian companies that are primarily shell companies whose sole intention would be the downstream investment in sectors with FDI restrictions, but it would also lead to the near total circumvention of the extent FDI policy making it ineffective," RBI said in the letter to the DEA.

 

ICWAI made 6 Cost Accounting Standards mandatory w.e.f. period commencing on or after 1st April 2010

The Council of the ICWAI at its 251st Meeting held on 12-13 February 2009 decided as below: Mandatory application of Cost Accounting Standards

"RESOLVED THAT the following Cost Accounting Standards

CAS 1: Classifications of Costs CAS 2: Capacity Determination CAS 3: Overheads CAS 4: Cost of Production for Captive Consumption CAS 5: Determination of Average (Equalized) Cost of Transportation CAS 6: Material Cost shall be mandatory with effect from period commencing on or after 1st April 2010 for being applied for the preparation and certification of General Purpose Cost Accounting Statements. Since there is no statutory requirement for the application of such Cost Accounting Standards for the preparation and certification of Cost Accounting Statements, in case the cost accountant is of the opinion that the aforesaid standards have not been complied with for the preparation of the Cost Statements, it shall be his duty to make a suitable disclosure/qualification in his audit report/certificate"

 

Election Commission blocks service tax sops for SEZ units & Developers

Developers of special economic zones (SEZ) and units operating in them will have to wait until a new government is formed to get a keenly-awaited exemption on service tax payments for services availed inside the zones.

The Election Commission (EC) has refused to allow the finance ministry to pass a notification allowing the exemption while elections are on because it could result in direct benefits to a section of the electorate, a government official has said. It will be the new elected government which will bring out the notification," the official said.

Until the elections are over, these units will have to pay the service tax and claim refunds, much to their disappointment as this process is lengthy and locks up cash.

Initially, SEZ units and developers had been allowed exemption on service tax on services availed within the boundaries of the zone, but were made to pay tax on services enjoyed outside the zone.

Following representations from the industry, the finance ministry decided to allow SEZs to claim refunds on services such as banking, courier and port-handling availed outside the zones.

The new notification, however, laid down that SEZ developers and units will get refunds for service taxes on services consumed both outside and inside the zones.

The commerce department, therefore, on behalf of SEZs, had asked the finance ministry to restore the exemption benefit which the zones had been enjoying on service tax availed within the zones.

"The finance ministry has agreed to the proposal. However, it has to wait now till the elections are over," the official added.

 

Banks allowed to open ATMs without Central Bank approval: RBI

The Reserve Bank on Tuesday allowed banks to open ATMs outside their branches without permission from the central bank.

"It is proposed to allow scheduled commercial banks (SCBs) to set up offsite ATMs without prior approval," the RBI said in its annual monetary policy.

The RBI further said a group would be constituted to review the existing framework of the branch authorization policy for providing greater flexibility and enhanced penetration.

KPMG's head of financial services, Abizer Diwanji, said ATM delicencing would improve banking efficiency considerably and overall cost-income ratios.

According to branch authorization policy, banks are given permission to open, close and shift all categories of branches including ATMs at a time, normally once a year, and the approval is valid for one year from the date of communication.a

 

HC & Sc judgment prevail over excise department circulars & Instructions: SC

The Supreme Court last week emphasised that circulars and instructions issued by the customs and excise boards are no doubt binding on the authorities but when the Supreme Court or a high court declares the law on a disputed question, the courts' view shall prevail.

The court reiterated the view last week in the case, Commissioner of Central Excise vs Hindoostan Spinning & Weaving Mills Ltd. The authorities had sought clarifications in some earlier judgments. Therefore, the Supreme Court once again asserted that the circulars represented only the understanding of the law by the officials. But they are not binding on the courts.

 

Three more credit information companies get RBI nod to do business

Reserve Bank of India has allowed three more credit information companies to do business. The banking regulator has also permitted the only  existing local credit bureau Cibil (Credit Information Bureau India Ltd) to maintain credit histories of insurance and telecom customers. The three new entities include Equifax Credit Information Services, Experian Credit Information Company, and Highmark Credit Information Services. These entities were short-listed from 13 applicants including Cibil. Business for credit bureaus is expected to grow given rising defaults in consumer credit and growing risk consciousness among lenders. Credit information companies inform banks whether a prospective borrower is creditworthy or not based on his past payment track record. Among the new entrants Equifax, is US based and Experian an Irish company in the credit information business. Both have a long-established transnational presence. Highmark is a start-up promoted by individuals Anil Pandya and Anuj Desai. With more players in credit information, competition is expected to hot up. Speaking to ET Arun Thukral, managing director, Cibil, said that the approval allows it to extend service to more industries including insurance and telecom, which will help widen its customer base. Commenting on the competition that would emerge with the entry of more players, Mr Thukral said that in advanced markets companies rely on credit information from more than one source and new entrants would not eat into Cibil's business. Cibil has close to 164 members from the financial sector that use its database.

 

Service Tax - Access to registered premises - Empowerment of Officers thereof

OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE::  MADURAI-625 002.

Trade Notice No.   19 /2009           Dated:   13.03.2009.        Service Tax No.     11/2009

Sub:- Service Tax – Access to registered premises – Empowerment of Officers thereof – Regarding.

            Rule 5 A was inserted in the Service Tax Rules, 1994 vide Service Tax (Sixth Amendment) Rules, 2007 (Notification No.45/2007 – ST dated 28.12.2007 refers).  Attention is also drawn to the instructions issued by the Board vide F.No.137/26/2007-CX.4 dated 01.01.2008 in this regard.  The service tax rules were amended to allow the officers to access the registered premises of the taxpayer for carrying out scrutiny, verification and checks as necessary to safeguard the government revenue.  The said Rule 5A envisages that Commissioners are required to duly authorise the officers before such access.

2.         Instances have come to the notice that some of the Commissionerates have issued Trade Notices, authorising all the officers of the rank of Inspectors and above, posted in the Commissionerate, to visit the taxpayers.  It was never the intention of the said amendment to allow unrestricted access to the premises of the taxpayer by the officers.  Issuance of such Trade Notices giving unfettered power to all the officers to visit taxpayers is against the spirit of the amendment in particular and policy of the Government in general.  While it is not necessary that Commissioners should authorise individual visits to taxpayer and a general authorisation can be granted, however, for each visit to the premises of the taxpayer, permission must be given in writing by an officer not below the rank of Assistant / Deputy Commissioner.

3.         It has been decided that, henceforth officers above the rank of Inspectors should be allowed access to the premises of tax payers in terms of Rule 5A of the Service Tax Rules, only after they are duly authorised in writing, in each case, by an officer not below the rank of concerned Assistant / Deputy Commissioner.  To facilitate such authorisation / permission, the same can be given through a register maintained for the purpose.  The proforma for such register is given in Annexure A hereto.  Such register should be reviewed and signed at the end of each month by the concerned Joint / Additional Commissioner and once in every quarter by the concerned Commissioner.

4.         This instruction would ipso facto apply to formations carrying out investigation functions.

5.         All instructions / clarifications / trade notices contrary to the aforesaid instructions stand cancelled / withdrawn.  

6.       This may be brought to the notice of all constituent members of your trade associations.     

( Authority: Board's letter F.No.137/26/2007-CX.4 dated 15.12.2008 )

( Issued from File C.No:IV/16/06/2009-STU )

  (A.S.MEENALOCHANI)

 DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

Encl: As above.

Schools running transport services for their students not liable to pay service tax

OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE::  MADURAI-625 002.

Trade Notice No.   17 /2009                 Dated:   13.03.2009.          Service Tax No.   9  /2009

Sub: Taxability of the Schools providing Buses for students of their Schools – Regarding.                      

          It was already clarified vide Board's letter F.No.137/70/2007-CX.4 dated 26.04.2008 that Schools running transport services for their students are not liable to pay service tax under the category of tour operator.  There has been no change in the stand taken by the Board.

2.        It is further clarified that the activity of schools to transport children from and back to the School on the cabs owned and run by them does not constitute renting a cab and schools do not fall in the category of rent-a-cab operator.  As regards hiring a cab by school from outside, the same has specifically been excluded from the scope of taxable service.  Hence, activity of transportation of school children on cabs owned by school or hired by school does not attract service tax.

3.          This may be brought to the notice of all constituent members of your trade associations.                       

 (Authority: Board's letter F.No.137/70/2007-CX.4(Pt) dated 15.12.2008)

(Issued from file C.No.IV/16/06/2009-STU)

(A.S. MEENALOCHANI)

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER.

Service Tax - Clarification regarding leviability of service tax on ship broking activity

OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE: MADURAI-625 002.

Trade Notice No.  16 /2009        Dated:   13.03.2009.     Service Tax No.    8 /2009

Sub: - Service Tax – Clarification regarding leviability of service tax on ship broking activity – Regarding.                    

          The ship broker ensures that the conditions of the contracts are adhered to.  They also follow up the movement of goods and freight payment till the cargo reaches its destination.  Hence, the activities undertaken by ship brokers are nothing but provision of services on behalf of client for a consideration akin to that of a commission agent.  As per Section 65 (19) (vii) (a) of the Finance Act, 1994, "Commission agent" means:-

          'any person who acts on behalf of another person and causes sale or purchase of goods, or provision or receipt of services, for a consideration, and includes any person who, while acting on behalf of another person-

       (i) deals with goods or services or documents of title to such goods or services; or

      (ii) collects payment of sale price of such goods or services; or

     (iii) guarantees for collection or payment for such goods or services; or

    (iv) undertakes any activities relating to such sale or purchase of such goods or services.

2.       The ship broker is acting on behalf of shipping lines / ship owner and causes provisions of services, for a consideration.  The activities of ship broker are akin to a commission agent.  Ship brokers not only provide services on behalf of shipping line / ship owner and charterer but also deal with the goods i.e., cargo.  This is clearly evident from the fact that it monitors the cargo movement till it reaches the destination.  Ship broker also ensures that freight is paid after cargo reaches the destination.  Hence the activities undertaken by ship broker are of commission agent and leviable to service tax under Business Auxiliary Service (BAS) of Section 65 (105) (zzb) of the Finance Act, 1994.

3.       In view of the above, it is clarified that the service rendered by ship broker is leviable to service tax under Business Auxiliary Service.    

4.       This may be brought to the notice of all constituent members of your trade associations.       

( Authority: Board's letter F.No.332/41/2008-TRU dated 19.12.2008 )

( Issued from File C.No:IV/16/06/2009-STU )

 (A.S.MEENALOCHANI)

   DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

 

Business Auxiliary Services - Commission received by Directors not liable to Service tax

Trade Notice No.  15  /2009          Service Tax No.    7  /2009  Dated:  13.03.2009.

Sub: Service Tax – Clarification regarding 'Commission' covered under "Business Auxiliary Service" – Reg.     

The matter regarding levy of service tax under the head 'Business Auxiliary Service' on the 'Commission' received by the Directors of the company has been examined.  The Board is of the view that some companies make payment to their officials, such as Managing Directors / Directors, terming the same as 'Commissions'. This payment may be over and above the salary and other remunerations.  Such commissions may be either performance linked or linked to the financial results of the company, but the fact is that it is nothing but remuneration paid to an employee by the employer.  The relationship between an employee and the employer is distinct from the relationship between a service receiver and service provider.  Thus action taken by an employee for the benefit of the employer cannot be in the nature of service.  Therefore, so long as the activities performed are duties within the framework of the terms of employment, the amount paid by an employer to an employee, even if it is termed as commission, would not be treated as 'commission' mentioned under the definition of business auxiliary service and service tax would not be leviable on such amount.

2.         This may be brought to the notice of all constituent members of your trade associations.

(Authority: Board's letter Dy.No.324/Comm (ST)/2008 dated 01.12.2008)

(Issued from file C.No.IV/16/06/2009-STU)

OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE:  MADURAI

 (A.S. MEENALOCHANI)

 

Service Tax - Utilisation of accumulated CENVAT credit restricted in terms of erstwhile Rule 6(3)( c) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004

OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE::  MADURAI-625 002.

Trade Notice No.  14 /2009       Dated:   13.03.2009.      Service Tax No.     6 /2009

Sub:- Service Tax – Utilisation of accumulated CENVAT credit restricted in terms of erstwhile Rule 6(3)( c) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 – Regarding.

 The issue of restriction of utilisation of accumulated CENVAT credit in terms of erstwhile Rule 6 (3) (c) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 has been examined.  The following points emerged during its consideration:

Ø       Prior to 01.04.2008 [before the amendment in Rule 6(3)] the option available to the taxpayer, under Rule 6(3), was that, he was allowed to utilize credit only to the extent of an amount not exceeding 20% of the amount of service tax payable on taxable output service.  However, there was no restriction in taking CENVAT credit and also there was no provision about the periodic lapse of balance credit.  This resulted in accumulation of credit in many cases.

Ø       W.e.f. 01.04.2008, under the amended Rule 6(3), the following options are available to the taxpayers not maintaining separate accounts;

     (i)       Option No.1 – In respect of exempted goods, he may pay an amount equal to 10% of the value of exempted goods; and in respect of exempted / non taxable services, he may pay an amount equal to 8% of the value of such exempted / non-taxable service.  OR

     (ii)      Option No.2 – He may pay an amount equivalent to CENVAT Credit attributable to inputs and input services attributable to exempted goods and non-taxable / exempted services.

Ø       As stated earlier, many taxpayers had accumulated CENVAT credit balance as on 01.04.2008.  The matter to be considered was whether this credit balance should be allowed to be utilised for payment of service tax after 01.04.2008.

Ø       As no lapsing provision was incorporated and that the existing Rule 6(3) of the CENVAT Credit Rules does not explicitly bar the utilization of the accumulated credit, the department should not deny the utilization of such accumulated CENVAT credit by the taxpayer after 01.04.2008.  Further, it must be kept in mind that taking of credit and its utilization is a substantive right of a taxpayer under value added taxation scheme.  Therefore, in the absence of a clear legal prohibition, this right cannot be denied.

2.       This may be brought to the notice of all constituent members of your trade associations.       

( Authority: Board's letter F.No.137/72/2008-CX.4 dated 21.11.2008 )

( Issued from File C.No:IV/16/06/2009-STU )

  (A.S.MEENALOCHANI)

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

 

Cenvat credit of excise duty/CVD paid on goods used in providing Supply of Tangible Goods service

OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE::  MADURAI-625 002. 

Trade Notice No.   12 /2009             Dated:   13.03.2009.        Service Tax No.     4 /2009

Sub:- Service Tax – Credit on 'Tangible goods' supplied during the course of providing taxable service u/s 65(105)(zzzzj) – Regarding.

                      Supply of tangible goods including machinery, equipments and appliance for use, without transferring right of possession and effective control of such tangible goods is a taxable service in terms of provision of Section 65 (105) (zzzzj) of the Finance Act, 1994.  In some case, vehicles, aircrafts, vessels etc., are also supplied in the above manner and such activities also fall under the said taxable service.  In this regard, a doubt has arisen whether the credit of excise duty / Additional duty of Customs (commonly known as CVD) paid on such items are available to the provider of such taxable service and if so whether such goods should be considered as 'inputs' or 'capital goods', for the purposes of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004.

2.       The matter has been examined.  It is possible that some of such goods may either fall within the definition of 'capital goods' or may not be covered under the said definition.  However, as these goods are primary requirements for providing the above mentioned 'output services' for such service providers, the goods including vehicles, aircrafts, vessels etc., are in the nature of 'inputs'.  It is emphasized here that this clarification is valid only when the output service is in the nature of service defined under the provisions of Section 65 (105) (zzzzj) of the Finance Act, 1994 and the goods in question are the tangible goods supplied during the course of providing the taxable service.  

3.       This may be brought to the notice of all constituent members of your trade associations.        

( Authority: Board's letter F.No.137/120/2008-CX.4 dated 23.10.2008 )

( Issued from File C.No:IV/16/06/2009-STU )                                                                                                                                                                  (A.S.MEENALOCHANI)

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

 

Delhi High Court held levy of service tax on Commercial Rent Unconstitutional

The Delhi High Court has struck down the levy of service tax on renting of immovable property as "unconstitutional", while deciding 26 writ petitions of different petitioners, by a combined order. The division bench of the Delhi High Court comprised of Mr. Justice Badar Durrez Ahmed and Mr. Justice Rajiv Shakdher observed that service tax shall not be levied on renting of immovable property. Alishan Naqvee, Advocate, LexCounsel Law Offices, who represented his clients in two of the petitions disposed off today, tells that the category of "renting of immovable property service" was introduced by the Finance Act of 2007. This, in effect brought renting, letting, leasing, licensing or other similar arrangements of immovable property for use in the course of furtherance of business and commerce, within the service tax net with effect from June 1, 2007. This new levy severely impacted business models across India as most of the rent arrangements did not even stipulate it beforehand. The businesses across India opted to en masse challenge the constitutionality of levy of service tax on rent, on the primary grounds that renting does not involve any service, and the Central Government is not empowered to tax consideration for transfer of rights in immovable property, being a state subject as per the Constitution of India. Few High Courts, including the High Court of Mumbai, Delhi, Gujarat, Andhra Pradesh, Kolkata and Chennai reportedly granted interim reliefs to the petitioners from payment of service tax until final disposal of their matters. The stays were however granted subject to undertakings by the petitioners, mainly tenants, to deposit the service tax amount with the Government if the tax was ultimately held constitutional. The Delhi High Court however is the first High Court to deliver the final order in the matter that would have persuasive value for the other High Courts. The detailed order of the Delhi High Court is expected to be available within the next couple of working days. One issue that needs to be seen is whether the Delhi High Court has expressly limited the applicability of its judgment to its territorial jurisdiction. Notably, while granting interim orders, the Delhi High Court had expressed that the stays would be operative within the territorial jurisdiction of the Court. Consequently, a number of petitioners, having operations in multiple states, were constrained to knock at the doors of the other High Courts. To avoid multiplicity of litigation, the Union of India preferred a transfer petition to the Supreme Court of India seeking transfer of all writ petitions pending before different High Courts of India, to the Delhi High Court for single window adjudication. It is open for the Government to prefer an appeal before the Supreme Court of India, challenging the decision of the Delhi High Court. The judgment however delivers great relief to the business by helping liquidity in the current times.

 

Loan approvals may be linked to phone bills, insurance payments in addition to your redit card and debt payment record

Applying for a loan? Check if you've paid your telephone bill or insurance premium first. Soon, your loan proposals will not depend only on your credit card and debt payment record with banks but also on whether you've paid your phone bill, insurance premium and stock broker dues on time.The Reserve Bank of India on Friday paved the way for banks to access more information on potential borrowers by granting in-principle approval for the registration of four companies under the Credit Information Companies (Regulation) Act (or CIC Act). These companies included Credit Information Bureau (India) Ltd or Cibil, Equifax Credit Information Services, Experian Credit Information Company of India and Highmark Credit Information Services. At present, Cibil is the largest agency, with database on around 135 million customers of 164 banks and non-banking finance companies. Once these companies receive the final registration and operational guidelines, they will be able to collect information from more sources. Cibil provides a credit score of up to 900 based on the borrower's liabilities and payment history. A delay in the payment of an instalment affects the credit score. Similarly, if a cheque is dishonoured, the credit record is impaired. Cibil provides the score and banks, based on their estimate of risk, decide whether to give a loan or not. From the next financial year, Cibil will also be able to provide citizens with the details of their credit history. The operational details for this service are being worked out, but the broad plan is to provide individuals a toll-free number or a website login to access the details after making a payment. "Identity theft is a big issue and we are trying to make the system foolproof. The problem is compounded by the lack of social security numbers," Cibil Managing Director Arun Thukral said. He, however, added that the process would be similar to getting details of your credit cards or mobile connections where certain queries need to be answered. The move to collect information from more sources is expected to help banks deal with unsecured loans and first-time borrowers, bankers said. But the actual implementation of the combined system that includes information not just from banks and finance companies could take a while. The details of utilities that could be covered are not clear. The draft rules only provided for insurance companies, stock brokers, credit rating agencies and telecom service providers. Utilities such as electricity and water supply providers were not listed.

Clarity will emerge once RBI issues the final set of guidelines, though agencies such as Cibil have been pushing for more agencies to be covered. The regulations issued so far only provide for insurance companies, stock brokers, credit rating agencies and telecom service providers to be brought under the ambit of the CIC Act.

 

Leave out freight, insurance in calculatuion of Assessable Value for Excise Duty : SC

The Supreme Court has held that freight and insurance charges are not to be taken into account in determining the value of goods for imposing excise duty.

A Bench headed by Justice S B Sinha, while dismissing the Commissioner of Central Excise's appeal, asked the (Excise) Department to pay Rs 25,000 to a manufacturer of electronic meters, Accurate Meters Ltd, towards the counsel's fee.

"... [W]e have no doubt ... that the tribunal (Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal) (was) correct in the view that the amount claimed by way of transportation charges and insurance cannot be considered for determining the value of the electric meters supplied," the Bench stated.

The tribunal in its ruling had turned down the Excise Department's plea. The apex court judgment had come on an appeal by the Central Excise Department against Accurate Meters Ltd, which had entered into contracts with various state electricity boards (SEBs) for supplying electric meters.

While the value of goods was to be fixed at the factory gate, it was decided between the parties that average freight and insurance were to be charged and not on actuals. According to the court, there were two separate contracts— one for the sale of electric meters, governed by the Sales of Goods Act, and the other governing the transportation of goods.

 

Investment of more then 50,000 in NSC and more then 1 lakh in ULIP investment may need PAN

You may soon need to mention your permanent account number (PAN) to invest more than Rs 50,000 in national savings certificates (NSC), or to buy a unit-linked insurance policy where premium payment exceeds Rs 1 lakh. The government is giving finishing touches to a proposal to make the taxpayer identification number mandatory to invest in several small savings schemes, a government official said.

It is also learnt that  the finance ministry has decided to extend quoting of PAN to other financial instruments but with suitable thresholds so that the requirement does not become a hurdle for small investor.

The proposal is set to be implemented after the general elections, the official added.

PAN is a 10-digit alphanumeric identification number which is allotted to any juridical entity, individual or company to be quoted with income-tax returns.

It is increasingly being required to be tagged with various financial transactions and information.

The interim budget pegs net collections under savings certificates, most of which would be in NSC, at Rs 4,100 crore. The mobilisation under small savings schemes has dropped in recent years as banks have been offering higher returns on fixed deposits. NSC, for instance, offers 8% against nearly 10% offered by banks recently.

The move will help income-tax authorities to check tax evasion. PAN allows them to establish an audit trail, as information can be matched with income and investment details disclosed in the tax return.

The move follows an announcement in this regard by the then-finance minister P Chidambaram in his Budget 2008 speech.

"The fear of PAN has virtually disappeared. PAN is now the sole identification number for all participants in the securities market. I propose to extend the requirement of PAN to all transactions in the financial market subject, however, to suitable threshold exemption limits," the minister had said.

Savings bank accounts will be excluded from the ambit of PAN as it could become a hindrance in the way of financial inclusion.

Presently, quoting of PAN is mandatory for credit card application, investment in mutual funds, time deposits of more than Rs 50,000 with any banking company or opening of savings account and deposit of more than Rs 50,000 with post office.

PAN is not required for investment in NSC, Kisan Vikas Patra and monthly income schemes from post office. Transactions such as purchase or sale of property, sale or purchase of a motor vehicle requiring registration other than two-wheelers, and payment to hotels and restaurants against bills exceeding Rs 25,000 also require PAN.

 

GST to be aligned with foreign trade after April 1, 2010

The new foreign trade policy, which is being prepared by the commerce ministry, will be aligned with the Goods and Services Tax (GST) only after implementation of this indirect tax mechanism.

The new policy is likely to be announced by the next government at the Centre by mid-2009, while the GST is likely to be implemented from April 1, 2010.

The current foreign trade policy of 2004-09 was unveiled by the United Progressive Alliance government on September 1, 2004 and was to expire on March 31, 2009. However, the Directorate General of Foreign Trade (DGFT) under the commerce ministry had extended its tenure till a new policy was ready.

The foreign trade policy has several export promotion measures that reimburse indirect levies charged on exports. These levies will now be subsumed under the proposed GST and will have only two slabs — one for the Centre and the other for the states. Therefore, the new export policy will have to specify how the current benefits given to exporters are matched with the proposed GST rates.

"We expect the new policy to be released by mid-2009. Till the GST mechanism is in place, provisions of the policy will not be changed. This is to ensure there is no confusion. Once GST is rolled out, the foreign trade policy will be modified to take into account the new taxation mechanism," said a government official requesting anonymity.

Officials are still not clear if the state-level GST levied on exporters will be reimbursed. At the moment, many state-level duties are not reimbursed to exporters.

The DGFT has already started consultations with various export-related organisations and industry lobby groups on the new Foreign Trade Policy.

Officials maintained that the new government would take a call whether the present structure of the foreign trade policy should be continued.

"The process of consultations will go on till April 20, after which the suggestions will be compiled. Thereafter inter-ministerial consultations will begin. The commerce ministry wants to be ready with the recommendations when the new government is in place," the official added.

Before the current policy was released, foreign trade procedures were spelt out through an "export-import policy". This mechanism was prevalent from 1992 to 2004. The UPA government replaced this with the current five-year trade policy to bring stability and incorporate sector-specific export promotion measures.

Exporters have been demanding a host of benefits in the new policy, including continuation of the Duty Entitlement Passbook Scheme, which was extended till further notice by the commerce ministry. This scheme, which is not compliant with world trade rules, reimburses indirect tax levied on inputs used by exporters.

Representatives of the Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry (Ficci), who met DGFT officials today, demanded customised schemes to help exporters tide over the liquidity crisis, reduce transaction time and other costs related to foreign trade.

Pointing out that reimbursement of Value Added Tax levied on exporters took about 12 to 15 months, Ficci demanded refund of the Fringe Benefit Tax and Service tax.

 

Lawyers not liable under Consumer Protection Act, 1986: SC

The State Commission, Delhi, held that services rendered by a Lawyer would not come within the ambit of s. 2(1)(o) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, as the client executes the power of attorney authorizing the Counsel to do certain acts on his behalf and there is no term of contract as to the liability of the lawyer in case he fails to do any such act. The State Commission held that it is a unilateral contract executed by the client giving authority to the lawyer to appear and represent the matter on his behalf without any specific assurance or undertaking. This verdict was reversed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission on the ground that lawyers are rendering a service. They are charging fees. It is not a contract of personal service and that there was no reason to hold that they are not covered by the provisions of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. It was held that though a Lawyer may not be responsible for the favourable outcome of a case as the result/out come does not depend upon only on lawyers' work, but, if there was deficiency in rendering services promised, for which consideration in the form of fee is received by him, then the lawyers can be proceeded against under the Consumer Protection Act. The said judgement of the NCDRC has now been stayed by the Supreme Court.

 

Government planning to have just one Registrar of Companies (ROC) in Delhi

The corporate affairs ministry is planning to have a single registrar of companies (RoC) in Delhi for the registration purpose of all companies in India. According to a senior corporate affairs ministry official, "There is no geographical constraint for the registration purpose of a company anywhere in India as there is no direct interface with the public. Since everything is done electronically, we are planning that there should be just one RoC in Delhi which will do the registration work of all companies in India."

A source from the ministry said the common problem that is often faced in case of different RoCs is that many companies end up having the same name. With just one RoC for registration purpose, this problem will be solved as name blocking would become easier. The overall registration of the companies across the country at just one place will help in standardising operating procedure and also optimal manpower utilisation.

The registrar of a company has two functions—registry function and regulatory function. The regulatory function involves keeping a check on the companies and making sure that they are not violationg the Companies Act. At present, if a company fails to file its annual returns to the RoC then the latter has the regulatory authority to issue them a notice and file a case against them in the local court. In this case, there is a need for a direct interface with the public and the RoCs of different states will be active for this purpose.

The registration of companies has become very easy after the government introduced an e-governance mode called MCA-21. The MCA-21 project is a computerisation programme which has helped the companies to file their company's documents electronically. The project is a public private partnership project of the government in which Tata Consultancy Services is the private player and also the partner. This project is technologically advanced and also saves a lot of time of the companies which initially used to go waste in loads of paperwork

 

Procedure to Incorporate a New Limited Liability Partnership

A Limited Liability Partnership may be incorporated as per the procedure explained below:

A) User Registration

Register yourself on the website of Ministry of Corporate Affairs, developed for LLP services, i.e. www.llp.gov. in . This website may also be accessed through the website of the ministry www.mca.gov. in On the home page of the URL www.llp.gov. in click "Register" tab on top right hand corner of the page.

· Fill in the registration form. Fields marked * in the form are to be mandatorily filled. Select your user name and password.

·Upload digital signature certificate

· On successful registration, system will give a message that you have been registered successfully.

B) Obtain Designated Partners Identification Number (DPIN).

· All designated partners of the proposed LLP shall obtain "Designated Partner Identification Number (DPIN)" by filing an application individually online in Form -7.

· For obtaining DPIN kindly log in by clicking on the "Login" tab on top right corner of the home page, enter your user name and password. After login, click on the E-forms link. List of e-forms will open. Click and open  Form 7.

· Fill up "Form 7" for allotment of DPIN.

· Pay filing fee of Rs.100 online through credit card (master/visa).

· Submit the application form online. The system will generate a provisional DPIN. Kindly note it carefully.

· Take the print out of the application form, affix a latest passport size photograph and get it attested/certified for submission physically along with documentary evidences for proof of identify and proof of residence with the Registrar LLP.

· Deliver the printed and signed application form, along with the prescribed documents by hand/courier/ registered post to the Office of Registrar, Ministry of Corporate Affairs,  3rd Floor, "Paryavaran Bhawan", CGO Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi-110003.

· For more details see Instruction Kit provided on the home page under "Users Guide" tab.

C) Digital Signature Certificate

· Partner/Designated partner of LLP/proposed LLP, whose signatures are to be affixed on the e-forms has to obtain class 2 or class 3 Digital Signature Certificate (DSC) from any authorized certifying agency, details of which are available on the home page of the llp portal under the tab "Certifying Authorities".

D) Reservation of name

· Log on to the LLP portal by clicking the "log in" tab on the top right corner of the homepage and enter your username and password. After login, click "E-Forms" link.

· Open Form-1 for reservation of name and fill in the details. Select name of the proposed LLP (upto 6 choices can be indicated).

· Any partner or designated partner in the proposed LLP may submit Form-1.

· Append digital signatures and submit the e-form.

· Pay the necessary fee by credit card (master/visa).

· Free name search facility (of existing companies / LLPs) is available on MCA portal (hyper link available on LLP portal).The system will provide the list of similar/closely resembling names of existing companies/LLPs based on the search criteria filled up.

· Details of minimum two designated partners of the proposed LLP, one of them must be a resident of India, is required to be filled in the application for reservation of name. Only individuals or nominees on behalf of the bodies corporate as partners can act as designated partners.

· Check status of your application by logging on the portal.

· For more details see Instruction Kit provided on the home page under "Users Guide" tab.

E) Incorporation of LLP

· Once the name is reserved  by the Registrar, log on to the portal and fill up Form-2 "Incorporation Document and Statement".

· Pay the prescribed registration fee as per the slab given in Annexure A of the LLP Rules, 2009, based on the total monetary value of contribution of partners in the proposed LLP.

· Statement in the e-form is to be digitally signed by a person named in the incorporation document as a designated partner having permanent DPIN and also to be digitally signed by an advocate/company secretary/chartered accountant/cost accountant in practice and engaged in the formation of LLP.

· On submission of complete documents the Registrar after satisfying himself about compliance with relevant provisions of the LLP Act will register the LLP, maximum within 14 days of filing of Form-2 and will issue a certificate of incorporation in Form-16.

· You can check status of your application by logging on to the portal.

·For more details see Instruction Kit provided on the home page under "Instruction Kit" tab.

F) Filing of LLP agreement (Form-3) and Partners' details (Form-4)

·Form 3 (Information with regard to LLP agreement and changes, if any made therein) and Form-4 (Notice of Appointment of Partner/Designate Partner, his consent etc.) may be filed with the prescribed fee simultaneously at the time of filing Form-2 or within 30 days of the date of incorporation or within 30 days of such subsequent changes.

For more details see Instruction Kit provided on the home page under "Instruction Kit" tab.

 

ICAI, ICWAI & ICSI yet to recognise Limited Liability Partnership (LLP)

Though the government has initiated the process of registering Limited Liability Partnership (LLP) firms, it would take a while before the chartered accountant (CA), company secretary (CS) and cost accounting firms convert to LLPs.

The three regulators — Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI), Institute of Company Secretaries of India (ICSI) and Institute of Cost and Works Accounts of India (ICWAI) — are yet to recognise LLP and need to amend the regulations.

A limited liability entity is a hybrid of existing partnership firms and full-fledged companies. A minimum of two partners are required for formation of an LLP. Besides, there is no limit on the maximum number of partners, unlike the current limit of 20 members in a partnership firm. On April 2, Delhi-based legal consultants Handoo and Handoo registered as the first LLP of India.

According to NK Jain, chief executive officer (CEO) and secretary of ICSI, it will require an amendment to the ICSI regulations to convert CS firms into LLPs. The same holds true for ICAI and ICWAI.

Currently, these firms have partners from their own discipline. For instance, a CA partnership can have only CAs as its partners. But under the LLP model, CAs and CSs or even advocates can set up multi-disciplinary firms, which would act as a "one-stop" shop for people to avail various professional services.

The ICSI draft for amendments in the existing regulations is being vetted by the legislation department of the Union law ministry, added Jain.

There are about 23,000 ICSI members in the country, of whom about 3,000 are practising company secretaries and there are about 2,000 to 2,500 CS firms.

According to Jain, these are mainly proprietary firms having two to four partners.

"We are still studying the effects of LLP, including the legal aspects," said Kunal Banerjee, president of ICWAI. He is hopeful that the process of bringing necessary amendments would be completed in two months. "We want to do it as fast as possible," added Banerjee.

A group at ICAI is studying all aspects of LLP, said a senior ICAI member. The entire process would take a couple of months, he added. There are about 65,000 practising CAs in the country and about 40,000 to 45,000 CA firms.

Under the LLP structure, liability of the partner is limited to his stake and no partner is liable on account of any independent or unauthorised acts of other partners. Individual partners are shielded from joint liability created by another partner's wrongful acts or misconduct.

On the other hand, under "traditional partnership firms", every partner is liable, jointly with all the other partners and also severally, for all acts of the firm done while he is a partner, irrespective of his stake.

 

Service of notice and the time limit for issuance of notice under subsection (2) of section 143 of the Income-tax Act

Sub-section (2) of section 143 of the Income-tax Act provides that the notice under this sub-section shall be served on the assessee within a period of twelve months from the end of the month in which the return is furnished. Further, the service of such notice must be affected in a manner laid down in sections 282, 283 and 284 of the Income-tax Act, read with General Clauses Act.

Instances have come to the notice of the department, where notices under subsection (2) of section 143, though issued by registered post within twelve months from the end of the month in which the return was furnished, have been held 'invalid' on the ground that the notice was actually received by the assessee after the limitation date and there was no 'service' as postulated under the section. This is notwithstanding the fact that the assessee has attended the assessment proceedings in response to the notice served on him. Instances have also come to notice where the orders of the assessing officer is being quashed on the consideration that there is no evidence of issue or service of notice, even though the assessee and his authorized representative have attended the hearing before the Assessing Officer during the assessment proceedings. Further, the design of the limitation period with reference to the end of the month leads to administrative inconvenience in as much as the last day of every month becomes a time barring date.

In order to address these issues and to reduce litigation, a new section 292BB in the Income-tax Act has been inserted and the provision of sub-section (2) of section 143 has been amended.

New Section 292BB provides that where an assessee has appeared in any proceeding or cooperated in any inquiry related to an assessment or reassessment, it shall be deemed that any notice under any provision of this Act has been duly served upon him in time in accordance with the relevant provision of the Act. Further, such assessee shall be precluded from taking any objection in any proceeding or inquiry under this Act that the notice was, -

(a) not served upon him; or

(b) not served upon him in time; or

(c) served upon him in an improper manner.

However, the provision of this section shall not apply where the assessee has raised such objection before the completion of the assessment or reassessment.

Similar amendment has also been carried out in the Wealth-tax Act.

Further, clause (ii) of sub-section (2) of section 143 of Income-tax Act has been amended to provide that the notice under sub-section (2) of section 143 shall be served on the assessee within a period of six months from the end of the financial year in which the return is furnished.

Applicability: This amendment has been made applicable with effect from 1st April, 2008. This means that the provision of new section 292BB shall apply in all proceedings which are pending on 1st April, 2008.

Similarly the amended provision of sub-section (2) of section 143 shall apply to all such returns ( irrespective of the assessment year to which the returns pertain) where notice under sub-section (2) of section 143 can still be issued on 1st April 2008 under the pre-amended provision.

For example, assessee "A" files his tax return on 31st March 2007, Assessee "B" files his tax return on 15th April 2007 and assessee "C" files his tax return on 16th October 2007. As on 1st April, 2008 notice under the pre-amended provision of subsection (2) of section 143 could not have been issued in case of "A" and could have been issued in cases of "B" and "C". Hence, the new provision shall apply for returns filed by "B" and "C" but not for return filed by "A". In cases of returns filed by "B" and "C", the notice under sub-section (2) of section 143 can be served on the Assessee on or before 31st September 2008. Any notice served on assessee in these two cases, after this date, will not be valid.

Note: Above is the Analysis of Amendment made by The Finance Act, 2008.

 

Extension of time limit for conditions to be satisfied by a provident fund for receiving or retaining recognition under the Income-tax Act

Extension of time limit set out in Rule 3 for complying with the condition laid down in Clause (ea) of rule 4 of Part A of the Fourth Schedule to the Income-tax Act Rule 4 of Part A of the Fourth Schedule to the Income-tax Act provides for the conditions which are required to be satisfied by a provident fund for receiving or retaining recognition under the Income-tax Act. Rule 3 of Part A of the Fourth Schedule provides that the Chief Commissioner or the Commissioner of Income-tax may accord recognition to any provident fund which satisfies the conditions prescribed in rule 4 and the rules made by the Board in this behalf. The proviso to sub-rule (1) of the said rule 3, inter-alia, specifies that in a case where recognition has been accorded to any provident fund on or before 31st day of March, 2006, and such provident fund does not satisfy the conditions set out in clause (ea) of rule 4 on or before 31st day of March, 2008, the recognition to such fund shall be withdrawn. One of the requirements of this clause (ea) of Rule 4 is that the establishment shall obtain exemption under section 17 of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (EPF&MP Act). With a view to provide further time to Employees' Provident Fund Organization (EPFO) to decide on the pending applications seeking exemption under section 17 of the EPF&MP Act, The proviso to sub-rule (1) of rule 3 of Part A has been amended so as to extend the time limit by one more year i.e., from 31st day of March, 2008 to 31st day of March, 2009. Applicability: This amendment has been made applicable with effect from 1st April 2008. Note: Above is the Analysis of Amendment made by The Finance Act, 2008.

 

Clarification regarding satisfaction for initiation of penalty under subsection (1) of section 271

Sub-section (1) of section 271 of the Income-tax Act empowers the Assessing Officer to levy penalty for certain offences listed in that sub-section. It is a requirement that the Assessing Officer is required to be satisfied before such a penalty is levied.

In the context of levy of penalty under section 271 of the Income-tax Act, there has been an ongoing dispute between the Income-tax department and taxpayers on whether an assessing officer is required to record his satisfaction before initiating penalty proceedings. The Income-tax department has held the view that no separate satisfaction is required to be recorded before initiating penalty proceedings. In the case of Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. S.V. Angidi Chettiar (44 ITR 739; 1962), the Supreme Court has, while dealing with penalty under section 28 of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, held that "satisfaction before conclusion of proceeding under the Act, and not the issue of a notice or initiation of any step for imposing penalty is a condition for the exercise of the jurisdiction". The same matter came up once again before the Calcutta High Court in the case of Becker Gray And Company (1930) Limited Vs. Income-tax Officer, Central Circle-I, Calcutta and Others (112 ITR 503; 1977). Relying on the Supreme Court decision in the above case, the Calcutta High Court held that "It is true that the Income-tax Officer should be prima facie satisfied before the penalty notice is issued, but it does not mean that he is required to record such satisfaction in writing in every case." Following these decisions, wherever additions are made, assessing officers have, without separately recording any satisfaction, been issuing directions for initiating penalty proceedings.

However, interpreting the aforesaid Supreme Court decision, the Delhi High Court has, in the case of CIV Vs. Ram Commercial Enterprises Limited (246 ITR 40 568; 2000) held that "It is the assessing authority which has to form its own opinion and record its satisfaction before initiating penalty proceedings."

Subsequently, the Allahabad High Court went into this issue in the case of Shyam Biri Works Pvt. Ltd. Vs. CIT (259 ITR 625; 2002). After considering the above Calcutta High Court decision and the Delhi High Court decision, it has held that "With profound respect to the Delhi High Court decision, we are unable to agree…. We are, therefore, of the opinion that although the Assessing Officer must have satisfaction as required under section 273 of the Act, it is not necessary for him to record that satisfaction in writing before initiating penalty proceedings under section 273 of the Act.".

In view of conflicting judicial opinion on this issue, it was necessary to make legislative intervention and settle the matter. Therefore, a new sub-section (1B) in section 271 of the Income-tax Act has been inserted. This sub-section unambiguously provide that where any amount is added or disallowed in computing the total income or loss of an assessee in any order of assessment or reassessment, and such order contains a direction for initiating of penalty proceedings under sub-section (1) of section 271, such an order of assessment or reassessment shall be deemed to constitute satisfaction of the assessing officer for initiating penalty proceedings under sub-section (1) of that section.

The proposed amendment has been given retrospective effect in order to protect the revenue's contention on this issue in pending cases. However, this retrospective effect will not prejudice taxpayers' right to agitate the levy of penalty on merits. Further, while no separate satisfaction is required to be recorded before initiating penalty proceedings, it is still incumbent upon the assessing officer to record his satisfaction before levying the penalty. Accordingly, there is neither violation of the principle of natural justice nor any prejudice caused to the taxpayer as a result of the retrospective amendment.

Similar amendment has also been carried out in the Wealth-tax Act.

Applicability: These amendments have been made applicable with retrospective effect from 1st April, 1989.

Note: Above is the Analysis of Amendment made by The Finance Act, 2008.

 

NEW TDS AND TCS PAYMENT AND INFORMATION REPORTING SYSTEM- NOTIFICATION NO. 858(E), DATED 25th MARCH, 2009 PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL GAZETTE

NEW TDS AND TCS PAYMENT AND INFORMATION REPORTING SYSTEM- NOTIFICATION NO. 858(E), DATED 25th MARCH, 2009 PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL GAZETTE

CIRCULAR NO. 02 / 2009, DATED 21-5-2009

The Finance Act, 2008 inserted a new sub-section (1A) in section 143 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 empowering the Board to make a scheme for centralised processing of returns with a view to expeditiously determining the tax payable by, or the refund due to, the assessee. For the purposes of enabling centralised processing of returns, it is necessary to ensure the integrity of the database, in particular, the information relating to tax deduction at source, advance tax and self assessment tax.

2. One of the fundamental principles of financial accounting is that if a person claims credit for payment of money to a third person, the credit should be allowed only if the payment and the information relating to the transaction have been received from the third person. The advance tax and self assessment tax is paid directly by the assessee by filling a challan which bears a unique Challan Identification Number (CIN) and the PAN of the assessee. These two number systems are used to cross verify the claim of tax payment made by the assessee and allow appropriate credit.

3. In the context of TDS, the first best principle is that no claim for TDS / TCS should be admissible unless the deductor / payer has paid the amount so deducted / collected to the credit of the Central Government and the information relating to the transaction is received. Since the business process of the Income Tax Department was manually organised and the volume of TDS related information was large, it was not feasible to undertake 100 per cent matching of TDS claims with information furnished by the deductor. Consequently, the Income Tax Department adopted a risk management strategy for allowing claim for TDS as a second best option. With the advances in information technology, it is technically feasible to design a business process which would enable 100 per cent matching in real time, thereby, eliminating the risk. Pursuant to the recommendation of the Task Force on Direct Taxes (chaired by Dr. Kelkar), as a first step in this direction, the deductors were required to electronically furnish the TDS related information (through the NSDL). This system was introduced in early 2004 as one of the modules of the Taxpayer Information Network (TIN).

4. The quantity and quality of data flowing through this module is far from satisfactory. The data is largely unverifiable. The matching of the deduction reported by the deductor and claimed by the deductee assessee continuous to be poor for the following reasons:-

(i) Non-compliance, especially by Government deductors, with TDS return filing requirement.

(ii) Low quoting of PAN number in TDS returns that are filed on account of non-furnishing of PAN by deductees to their deductors and negligence by deductors.

5. Unlike in the case of advance tax and self assessment tax, the TDS information does not bear a unique transaction identification number. As a result, the PAN forms the only basis for matching. To the extent PAN quoting is inadequate or deficient, it is not feasible to match the claim made by the deductee assessee with the TDS information reported by the deductor. Hence, it becomes necessary to make ad-hoc rules for allowing credit for TDS or in the alternative, interface with the assessee for physical verification of the TDS certificate. Both these approaches are flawed since there is no reconciliation of deductees claim with the information provided by the deductor and the integrity of the system is questionable. The efforts of the Income Tax Department over the last four years for improving the TDS and TCS database have not yielded desired result.

6. Further, Government (both Central and State together) is the largest deductor of tax being the largest employer and the largest spender on works contract. Under the extant procedure, tax deducted by the Central Government departments is paid to the account of the Central Government through book transfer. Unlike other deductors, these departments do not make any direct payment of the TDS amount in the banks. Similarly, the Central Government Ministries, departments and their sub-ordinate and attached offices are large scale defaulters in complying with the TDS information reporting requirements. Even the certificates issued by these organisations are often illegible and of poor quality. Hence, these are unreliable. This has been a constant source of public grievance. It also creates an opportunity for interface with the taxpayer. This process also does not assure the department of the legitimate revenues and enforce compliance. Hence, the mechanism of payment of tax so deducted and compliance with the reporting requirements is not satisfactory.

7. Unlike the Central Government, the State Government is required to make a consolidated payment of the TDS amount in respect of all its deductors and deductions directly into the Reserve Bank of India. This is done by the Accountant General of the State. As a result, there is no correlation between the deduction, payment and reporting. Further, compliance by State Governments with the TDS information reporting requirement is no better than in the case of the Central Government.

8. In the light of the above, the Department adopted the second best option of a risk management strategy for allowing TDS claims. Under this strategy, the Department has been allowing credit for TDS claims even though the transactions do not fully match/reconcile with the information provided by the deductor. Further, the Department have also been unable to undertake follow up verification of such claims at the deductors end on account of inadequate resources. As a result the system is vulnerable and exposes public revenues to extreme risk of fraud and leakage.

9. With a view to resolving the problems in granting credit for pre-paid taxes, the Central Board of Direct Taxes constituted a sub-group to analyse the various problems in granting credit for prepaid taxes and make appropriate recommendations. According to the Sub-group, the problem of matching and reconciliation of prepaid taxes is rooted in the three sets of data pertaining to TDS entering the system separately at different times from different sources, thus causing mismatch. Therefore, the Sub-group recommended that the problem can be solved if the agency receiving the TDS amount and the TDS returns (and the documents by which this is done) is the same. In such a situation the TDS payments can be immediately credited to the accounts of the deductees by the agency handling both the operations. For example, if the detailed list giving break-up and identity particulars of deductees are given to the bank along with the TDS challans for the consolidated amount of TDS at the time of payment, the accounts of deductees can be simultaneously credited, thus eliminating the reconciliation issues between challan data in OLTAS and in TDS returns. Owing to the advances in technology, it is now feasible to implement this recommendation.

10. The Sub-group also examined the issue of granting credit for TDS deducted by government deductors and recommended that Central Government deductors should also be brought into the discipline of deposit of TDS in bank accounts like other deductors.

11. As stated above, the Government has introduced the centralised processing of returns which envisages no interface with the taxpayer. Further, the processing is also required to be done in an automated jurisdiction-less manner. Therefore, it is necessary to have in place a perfect TDS payment and information reporting system so as to optimise the efficiency of the centralised return processing system. It is imperative to move to the first best solution to also minimize the risk of financial fraud. This is in the interest of all stakeholders Government, Income-tax Department and taxpayers. Therefore, the Board have decided that, henceforth, claim for TDS and TCS shall be allowed only if the

(i) amount has been deposited by the deductor / collector;

(ii) information relating to the deductee has been furnished by the deductor / collector; and

(iii) claim matches the information furnished by the deductor / collector.

12. With a view to enabling the implementation of the aforesaid decision, the TDS and TCS payment and information reporting system has been redesigned vide notification No. 858(E) dated 25th March, 2009 published in Official Gazette. The salient features of the new TDS and TCS payment and information reporting system are the following: -

(i) The new system has been harmonized for all deductors (including Central and State Governments). Therefore, like non-governmental tax deductors, every deductor in the Central and State Government have also been made responsible for making direct payment of TDS in the bank. They are no longer allowed to make payments of the TDS and TCS by making book adjustments or consolidated payments. As a result, the TDS payment and information reporting system will be uniform across deductors.

(ii) Rule 30 and Rule 37 CA of the Income-tax Rules, 1962 have been substituted to provide, inter alia, for the following: -

(a) All sums of tax deducted at source under Chapter XVII-B and of tax collected at source under Chapter XVII-BB shall, in general, be paid to the credit of the Central Government within one week from the end of the month in which the deduction, or collection, is made. Similarly, the same time limit for payment will also apply for income-tax due under sub-section (1A) of section 192.

(b) It is mandatory for all deductors (including Central Government and State Governments) to pay the amount by electronically remitting it into the RBI, SBI or any authorized bank.

(c) It is mandatory for all deductors (including Central Government and State Governments) to make the payment by electronically furnishing an income-tax challan in Form No. 17.

(iii) In the process of electronically furnishing the income-tax challan in Form No. 17, the deductor will be simultaneously required to furnish to the Taxpayer Information Network (TIN) system maintained by National Securities Depository Limited (NSDL) either through screen based upload or file upload, three basic information relating to the deduction i.e., PAN, name of the deductee and amount of TDS/TCS.

(iv) Upon successful remittance of the TDS/TCS to Central Government account and the uploading of the basic information as mentioned above to the TIN system, every deduction record will be assigned a unique transaction number (UTN).

(v) NSDL will create a facility to e-mail the UTN file to the deductor if the e-mail address of the deductor is available with them. In addition, they will also create a facility for the deductor to download the UTN file.

(vi) The UTN will be required to be quoted by the deductor on the TDS/TCS certificate issued by him to the deductee.

(vii) NSDL will also create a facility to allow independent viewing of the UTNs by the deductee.

(viii) With a view to enabling the Income Tax Department to monitor compliance by the deductor with the TDS provisions, every person (including Central Government and State Government) who has obtained a Tax Deduction or Collection Account Number (TAN) shall electronically furnish a quarterly statement of compliance with TDS provisions in Form No. 24C. It is mandatory for all TAN holders to furnish this form irrespective of whether any payment liable to TDS has been made or not. This form shall be furnished on or before the 15th July, the 15th October, the 15th January in respect of the first three quarters of the financial year, respectively, and on or before the 15th June following the last quarter of the financial year. This e-form No. 24C has to be furnished at http://incometaxindiaefiling.gov.in. The first quarter in respect of which Form 24C is required to be furnished is the quarter ending on 30th June, 2009.

(ix) In order to enable the deductor to furnish the UTN to the deductee, the existing Form 16 and Form 16A have been appropriately modified.

(x) The quarterly returns of TDS and TCS hitherto required to be filed in Form No. 24Q, Form No. 26Q, Form No. 27Q and Form No. 27EQ shall now be required to be filed for all quarters on or before the 15th June following the Financial Year. Effectively, the quarterly returns have now been replaced by an annual return.

13. The above new system will be effective for all tax deducted at source or tax collected at source on or after the 1st April, 2009. However, any TDS or TCS effected on or after the 1st April, 2009 but not later than 31st May, 2009 shall continue to be paid to the credit of the Central Government by using the old challan form. The TDS or TCS effected on or after the 1st June, 2009 shall be required to be paid electronically by electronically furnishing income tax challan in Form No. 17.

14. Where the payment of TDS or TCS effected on or after the 1st April, 2009 but not later than 31st May, 2009 is paid to the credit of the Central Government by using the old challan form, the deductor / collector shall, nevertheless, be required to fill up Form No.17 in respect of such payments any time between 1st July, 2009 to 15th July, 2009. Therefore, the deductors/collectors are advised to prepare the schedule relating to details of TDS / TCS from deductees in Form No.17 in advance (in an excel sheet) and be in a state of preparedness to file the same by 15th July, 2009 so that the UTNs relating to TDS / TCS transactions carried out in the month of April and May can be generated / obtained for onward transmission to the deductees.

15. Further, a deductor can split the total amount of TDS and TCS which he is required to deposit to the credit of the Central Government so that every deposit to the account of the Central Government is made through a separate challan in Form 17. For example, if a deductor is liable to deposit Rs. 1 lakh, he can split the amounts into four payments of Rs 25000/- each and deposit each of the amounts through a separate challan in Form 17 at four different times.

16. The return of income in Form No. ITR-1 to Form No.ITR-8 for Assessment Year 2009-10 have been notified which requires, amongst other, the quoting of the relevant UTN for every TDS or TCS claim made by the assessee. Therefore, the credit for any TDS or TCS claim will be allowed, amongst others, if the assessee quotes the relevant UTN for every TDS and TCS claim and the said UTN matches with the UTN in the database of the Income Tax Department. With a view to enabling the processing of returns relating to Financial Year 2007-08 (Assessment Year 2008-09) and enabling the assessee to receive the UTN for TDS and TCS transactions in the Financial Year 2008-09 (relevant for Assessment Year 2009-10), the following procedure shall be followed: -

(a) National Securities Depository Limited (NSDL) shall assign an UTN for every TDS and TCS transaction records in Financial Years 2007-08 and 2008-09, reported in the quarterly returns received by it.

(b) NSDL will create a facility to e-mail the UTN file to the deductor if the e-mail address of the deductor is available with them. In addition, they will also create a facility for the deductor to download the UTN file.

(c) Upon receipt of the UTN, the deductor will inform the UTN to the deductee. In cases where the UTNs are available to the deductor before the issue of the TDS/TCS certificate to the deductee, the deductor will indicate the UTNs on the certificate. However, if the UTNs are not available to the deductor before the issue of TDS/TCS certificate, the deductor shall, subsequently, send a consolidated statement of all TDS/TCS transactions indicating the UTNs.

(d) NSDL will also create a facility to allow independent viewing of the UTNs by the deductee. As a result, even if the UTNs are not received by the deductee from the deductor, they can be directly obtained from the NSDL database and quoted while making claims of TDS and TCS in the return of income.

17. TDS certificates were hitherto required to be issued in Form 16 or Form 16A as the case may be. Similarly, TCS certificates were issued in Form 27D. These forms have been substituted by the new Form 16, Form 16A and Form 27D with effect from the 1st day of April, 2009. In the new Forms, it is mandatory for the deductor/collector to quote, inter-alia, the UTN. Therefore, where the certificate is required to be issued in respect of deduction or collection made before the 1st April, 2009, the deductor/collector may adopt any of the following course of action:-

(a) The deductor/collector may issue certificate of deduction or collection in the Form 16, Form 16A or Form 27D, as the case may be, as it existed prior to 1st April, 2009 and send a consolidated statement of UTNs to the deductee/buyer/lessee etc., as soon as the same is received by him; or

(b) The deductor/collector may issue certificate of deduction or collection in the new Form 16, Form 16A or Form 27D, as the case may be.

18. Rule 31 of the Income Tax Rules, as it existed prior to its substitution, provides that, in general, the TDS certificates in Form 16 and Form 16A should be issued within one month from the end of the month in which the deduction is made. Similarly, Rule 37D, as it existed prior to its substitution, provides that, in general, the TCS certificates in Form 27D should be issued within one month from the end of the month in which the collection is made. Therefore, if the deductor/collector chooses to adopt the course specified in item (b) of para 13 above, the TDS/TCS certificate may be issued beyond the stipulated period of one month but not later than 30th June, 2009.

19. As regards, TDS/TCS certificates in respect of deduction or collection effected on or after the 1st April, 2009, it is mandatory to issue the certificates in the new Forms and quote the UTN relating to the TDS/TCS transactions.

20. As stated above, a new Form 24C has been notified to monitor compliance with the provisions of TDS/TCS. The first part of the Form relates to personal information and filing status. The Schedule COM-I relates to details of TDS/TCS compliance in the first month of the relevant quarter. Likewise details of TDS/TCS compliance for the second and third month of the relevant quarter would have to be reported in Schedule COM-2 and Schedule COM-3 respectively. In this Schedule in column (3), for example, against section 194A in column (1), the TAN holder is required to furnish the total amount of interest paid during the month. Let us assume that this total amount is Rs. 1 crore. In column (4) of the corresponding entry, the deductor is required to furnish the total amount on which TDS was liable or eligible to be deducted out of Rs. 1 crore. As is well known, no TDS is required to be deducted if the interest payment is less than Rs. 10,000. If the total of the amounts of interest payment/credit less than Rs. 10,000 is Rs. 30 lakhs, then the deductor must report in column (4) an amount of Rs. 70 lakhs (Rs. 1 crore Rs. 30 lakhs). In column (5), the deductor has to report that the total amount on which tax was deducted at prescribed rate out of the amount reported in column (4). In the instant case the rate of tax to be deducted at source is 11.33 percent (including surcharge and education cess). However, in many instances the recipients of interest exceeding the threshold limit of Rs. 10,000/- would either furnish certificate for non deduction of tax or deduction at a lower rate than the prescribed rate. Let us assume that the amount of interest paid to such recipients is Rs. 15 lakhs. Therefore, the amount of interest payment liable to TDS at the prescribed rate would be Rs. 55 lakhs (Rs. 70 lakhs Rs. 15 lakhs), which is required to be reported in column (5). Since the prescribed rate is 11.33%, and the amount of interest liable to TDS at the prescribed rate is Rs. 55 lakhs, the amount of TDS on such payment is Rs. 6,23,150/-. This amount is required to be reported in column (6). In column (7), the deductor is required to report the amount of Rs. 15 lakh i.e., the amount of interest payment liable to TDS at less than the prescribed rate. Let us assume that the TDS at nil or lower rate on the amount of Rs. 15 lakh is Rs. 50,000/-. This amount would be required to be reported in column (8). The total amount of TDS of Rs. 6,73,150/- (Rs. 6,23,150 + Rs. 50,000) is required to be reported in column (9). The above example is reproduced below in the tabular form as would appear in Form 24C:-

Section

Nature of payment

Total Expense or Capital outgo under the section

Total Amount on which

TDS / TCS was liable or eligible to

be deducted or collected out of (3)

Total Amount

on which tax was deducted or collected

at prescribed rate

out of (4)

Amount of

tax deducted or collected

on (5)

Total Amount on which tax was deducted or collected at less than prescribed rate out of (6)

Amount of

tax deducted or collected

on (7)

Total

Amount

=(6) + (8)

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

(8)

(9)

194A

Interest other than interest on securities

1,00,00,000

70,00,000

55,00,000

6,23,150

15,00,000

50,000

6,73,150

21. Form 24C is required to be furnished by all TAN holders irrespective of whether a TDS/TCS transaction has been effected during the quarter or not. In the event of the column (3) of the Schedules in From 24C is zero for all nature of payments, the deductor/collector should specify in the section on filing status in Form 24C that it is a case of Nil Return and it would not be necessary to fill in the Schedules.

22. In Schedule PAY of Form 24C, the deductor/collector is required to indicate the details of the payment of the TDS/TCS to the credit of the Central Government.

23. The new TDS and TCS payment and reporting system will enable faster payment, accurate accounting and uniformity across deductors. It will facilitate accurate, quicker and full credit for taxes paid enabling faster refunds to taxpayers. It will also minimize interface of tax administration with taxpayers and intermediaries, thereby eliminating any opportunity for rent seeking behaviour.

 

JOIN NOW!

Subscribe to r_e_a_c_h_o_u_t
Powered by tech.groups.yahoo.com

Indian Standard Time

Visitors

Supported by the website design company guide .